Not So, Social Media.
- bellaverdi
- Jan 18
- 6 min read

This week marks the beginning of a month of detoxing from Social Media for me. My reason (excuse) for using it is to promote my work and my beliefs, in whatever way, shape or form they come to me, to help other people understand that life isn't just about one thing or one way of looking at things, and essentially, to attract new work.
The reality that blows this theory out of the water though is that the majority of the clients I have, and have ever had, have come via word of mouth from other people that I've helped in the past. So what really keeps me on there apart from the satisfaction I get from creating a post or video that, if I'm looking at it from a commercial point of view, isn't achieving the aim? Maybe after my self-imposed 28 day ban I'll have reached some sort of answer to that.
The other reason for this ban is after having a conversation with a friend, Antonia (Creating a Safe Space for Healing) who specialises in helping people to recover from addictions and the fact that I'm going to be interviewing her for a podcast in the next few weeks, I wanted to find out for myself just how difficult weaning myself off social media would be. I don't consider myself to be an addict but the fact that I'm compulsively using these platforms, regardless of the justification I may feel I have for being on them, might suggest otherwise. And if that is reality, then it could also extend to the other 5 billion plus users (63% of the World's population) who also use it regularly.
One of the most disturbing aspects of using Social Media is the effect that is can have on younger people. The young mind is fertile ground and teenagers in particular, are impressionable. As parents we can be very prompt to ask them where they're going after they've eaten dinner, who they're going to be with and what time they should come home but we don't see the dangers that our child could be exposed to whilst they're sitting in their bedroom scrolling online because they're safe at home. Even as I try to research the statistics on harm to children outside of the home in order to compare it with harm they may experience online, I find the first paragraph mentioning grooming that takes place online and further on, cyber bullying.
Recently, British mother, Ellen Roome MBE - currently suing TikTok over the death of her son Jools - travelled to the United States to support other parents who have also lost children as a result of challenges posted on TikTok. Challenges that have circulated on platforms such as this have included;
‘Blackout Challenge’ which encourages participants to choke themselves until they lose consciousness.
The 'Tide Pod Challenge' which involves ingesting laundry detergent packets and
‘Car Surfing' which encourages riding on the outside of a moving vehicle.
Any one of these could result in a death, and yet for various reasons it seems that the most likely action taken to a death that may have come as a result of a challenge, results in posts being removed from Social Media platforms and preventative measures put in place against it being posted again in the future.
Ellen has been fighting for access to her son's Social Media history since his death in April 2022. Current legislation prevents her having access to it due to Data Protection Laws as well as the difficult job of knowing which data needs to be preserved and released by OFCOM to the coroner as this has to be specific.
Jools’ Law (Joolslaw | Ellen Roome - Jools' Law)is a campaign, begun by Ellen which calls for:
Automatic preservation of children’s online data within 5 days of a child's death.
Release of that data to coroners, not directly to families, to ensure independence and safety.
Clear, standardised processes so evidence is not missed because coroners or parents do not know which platforms or data types to request.



Comments